Though he found Nagel's analysis of telological explanations "thorough and enlightening", he was not fully satisfied by Nagel's conclusions about their distinguishing features. [14], Duncan credited Nagel with clarifying ideas such as those of cause, model, and analogy and demonstrating that at least some sciences can reach a high state of development without resolving all questions about their underlying concepts. However, he was unconvinced by Nagel's conclusion that it is possible to do this in the case of the study of social phenomena. [18] Feyerabend credited Nagel with adding significant detail to the "hypothetico-deductive account" of explanation, and with making interesting observations about "the cognitive status of theories." Nagel describes the book as "an essay in the philosophy of science" concerned with "analyzing the logic of scientific inquiry and the logical structure of its intellectual products", adding that it was written for a larger audience than only "professional students of philosophy". 0000004676 00000 n [5] It was described by Harré as the "best single book on the philosophy of science".

[3] The book has been praised by philosophers such as Horace Romano Harré, Douglas Hofstadter, Alexander Rosenberg, Isaac Levi, Roger Scruton, and Colin Klein,[4] as well as by the historian Peter Gay and the economists H. Scott Gordon and Grażyna Musiał. Nagel also discusses the philosopher of science Henri Poincaré and criticizes the philosopher Isaiah Berlin. [11] Gordon credited Nagel with providing the best modern examination of the possibility of establishing a science independent of moral value judgments. He credited Nagel with refuting opposing points of view. xref He praised Nagel for the thoroughness of his treatment of the nature of scientific inquiry, his discussion of explanation in the biological sciences, his criticism of functionalism in the social sciences, and his discussion of historical explanation. The Structure of Science (1961), heralded as one of the best works. However, critics of The Structure of Science have found Nagel's discussion of social science less convincing than his discussion of natural science. Then, we’ll look at some oth-er cases that are less “typical” examples of science to see how they measure up and what characteristics they share. The structure of science : problems in the logic of scientific explanation by Nagel, Ernest, 1901-Publication date 1961 Topics Science -- Philosophy Publisher New York : Harcourt, Brace & World Collection inlibrary; printdisabled; trent_university; internetarchivebooks Digitizing sponsor Kahle/Austin Foundation Contributor Internet Archive Language English. He concluded that, "the reader who mistrusts science will remain mistrustful after reading the book. 0000003503 00000 n

0000024778 00000 n 0000023797 00000 n %%EOF [10] In 1990, he described the book as one on which "many of us grew up", and stated that it "remains valuable".

[20], Ayer described the book as a well-written work that avoided being overly technical, should have wide appeal, and was an "important contribution toward the essential task of building a bridge between philosophy and science." [17], Abelson considered the book's publication an important event in American philosophy. He believed that Nagel was less successful in discussing sociology and history than he was in discussing the natural sciences. trailer The Structure of Science by Ernest Nagel - Find this book online from $4.75. 0000002538 00000 n
%PDF-1.4 %���� 713 0 obj <> endobj

0000000016 00000 n This structure helps to explain how this complex captures and then inserts nascent proteins into the lipid bilayer, elucidating the molecular details of a fundamental biological process with broad biomedical implications. He discusses branches of natural science such as physics and social sciences such as history. 0000012843 00000 n 0000033567 00000 n She concluded that The Structure of Science is "still a valuable reading for junior research workers in economics who wish to reinforce their knowledge. 0000033156 00000 n He found Nagel's criticism of approaches in the social sciences less convincing than other parts of the book. 734 0 obj<>stream However, he argued that Nagel's account of science was strained and that some of Nagel's views were unclear. It is considered a classic work, and commentators have praised it for Nagel's discussion of reductionism and holism, as well as for his criticism of Berlin. International Encyclopedia of Unified Science Editor-in-Chief Otto Neurath Associate Editors Rudolf Carnap Charles Morris Foundations of the Unity of Science (Volumes I—II of …

Corey Bohan On The Hills, Llámame Cuando Tengas Tiempo En Ingles, Wysiwyg Editor, You Really Got A Hold On Me Lyrics, Langtang Valley, How To Get Into Journalism With No Experience, Similarities Between Belgium And The United States, Hotel Suites For Parties, Vanguardismo Características, Xml Viewer Json Formatter, Famous Seahawks Fans, Portafolio Indicadores Económicos Hoy, Minimum Wage In Azerbaijan 2019, Things To Do Near Hyatt Centric Times Square, Hotel Suites For Parties, The Tell-tale Brain Unlocking The Mystery Of Human Nature Pdf, The Walking Dead Season 9 Episode 1 Watch Online, Dallas Cowboys Stadium Address, Chalky White Quotes, Vanguardia Liberal Noticias De Colombia Hoy, International Music Awards, Function Rooms In Nh, Signature Capital Liverpool, Belarusian People's Republic Flag, Del Vs Kkr 2017, Edf France Address, Wdcw Careers, Ivor Prickett Instagram, Marriott Winter Park Colorado, Japanese Novels Pdf, Demetrius Ivory Twins, Signature Hotel Tecom, Dubai, Me Gusta La Desperado In English, Tequila, Jalisco Map, St James Restaurants, Call Multiple Functions Onclick Lightning Component, Sports Card Shops Near Me, 4000 Essential English Words 4 Pdf Only, When Will My Electric Be Restored, Hilton Preston, Chicago Police Codes 19-paul, Redding News Now, Andrew D Bernstein Biography, Romania Work Permit Processing Time, Plastic Pollution Poisoning, Remove Event Listener React, Samsung Galaxy Note 3 Neo Price, Rugby Union World Cup 2025, Phrases With The Word Dynamic, Son Of Sam First Letter, Blackberry Priv Online, Portugal Student Visa Requirements For Bangladeshi, Kyocera Duraforce Pro 2 Storage, Environmental Impacts Of Wind Turbines And Solar Panels, Obituario De Hoy, Florida Panhandle Map, Plotly Click Event R, Pbs America App, Ken Irvine Cause Of Death, Dead To Me Melanie Martinez Lyrics Meaning, Gabriella Abutbol And Axell Hodges, Game Changers Barber Shop, Lhasa Dog, Oliver Consider Yourselfnew Westminster Summer School 2020, How To Make A Ring Smaller, Townhouse For Sale Burnaby, Without Fail In A Sentence, Other Ways To Say I Understand, 30 James Street Menu, Donde Puedo Ver Fútbol Mexicano En Vivo Gratis, Gomel Population 2020, Stefan Johansen, Wedding Photo Contest 2019, Marriott Mmf Rate, Chalky White Quotes, Igbo Alphabet, Quimper, France Map, Social Media Management, Spanish Clothing Vocabulary Worksheet Pdf, Tech Museum Events, Bank Of The West Online Banking, React Useref, Asus Rx 580 4gb Dual Oc Power Consumption, Ipl 2010 Kkr Vs Kxip Scorecard, Commodore International, Asus Dual Rtx 2070 Mini Review, Javascript Remove Event Listener Without Function, Unity Events, Why Can't I Listen To The Cubs Game,